Are Pro lenses better?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/96bc9/96bc90c3dc2ee46e3a8996d76c633556e48c1048" alt="" |
Olympus 12-40mm 2.8F Pro |
I shoot with Pro grade lenses, a question I am often asked is are they better?
Pro lenses are built for heavy use and usualy weather sealed, and I shoot nearly everyday under all kind of weather situations. I leave my 12-40mm f2.8 pro lens on my Olympus OM-D E-M1 all the time, I also have the consumer grade 40-150mm f4-5.6 in my camera bag for when I need extra reach.
My 40-150 lens is plastic and feels cheap compare to my metal built 12-40 lens, of course one cost me $1040 and the other $199. Pro grade lenses are sharper, yes, faster and offer much better auto focus in low light situations. For general outdoor daytime use consumer level lens can do the job at a fraction of the cost of a pro grade lens.
Bellow are two photos shot at 40mm with the same camera, in ideal situations the difference is minimal.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/28b9f/28b9f49cdc3e64b78e8ab722e681540013536fc7" alt="" |
12-40 f2.8 Pro | | | |
|
A cropped view of the above image shot with a 12-40 f2.8 pro lens at 40mm, iso 200, f14, 1/125 sec.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f0230/f0230b5deec40773bf502bdbc4f6da2a721ec246" alt="" |
40-150mm f4-5.6 |
|
|
The second shot is a cropped version done with the 40-150mm R lens at 40mm that cost $199. In this case the difference is minimal because of the size of the photo. At just 190 grams and under 4 inches high, I carry this lens with me in my camera bag at all times. A great little lens for the price. When purchasing lens, always buy the latest version, even if it cost a bit more. The newer versions are always improved over the later versions and worth the small extra cost.
Labels: olympus, outdoor, pro grade, pro lens, spring.crop